Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 5,854teamzr1 Owner - Pays the bills
teamzr1 Owner - Pays the bills Lives in Engine Bay
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,854
America
The objective of these tests were to see what the effects of our water/methanol injection kit, NOS and the use of both and the effects
It also was to prove that installing a NOS nozzle before the MAF had zero positive verus installing after the MAF Tests showed in fact that the PCM who calculates delivered torque cannot measure increased torque since the MAF cannot measure NOS content even when NOS is flowing through the MAF
Weather 89 degrees, 3,600 feet elevation Mustang Powerdyne load bearing Dyno adding load to equal 3,500 lbs of car. NOS = 150 shot installed before the MAF on purpose to test a point 50/50 ratio water/meth injection Water temps never got over 187, oil temps 192 for all 4 runs. Went in with full tank gas, still on full when left shop NOS 10 lb tank was full minus 1 street NOS run NOS Tank was monitored for it's heated temps was from 90 to 150 degrees Dyno weather station verified to be working correcting
Rear end gear 3.73, dyno started at 75 MPH.
All 4 runs were done with hood down and small fan close to ground level in front of car
Corrected SAE numbers rearwheel for Team ZR-1's 1999 Rebel
Quick Results
Dyno results
N/A - powertrain only
Water/Methanol only
WI and NOS functional
NOS only
Scanner data when using NOS This shows that the PCM saw zero increase in torque even though NOS is flowing through MAF. Is a false notion you MUST install NOS nozzle before the MAF and in fact best case is AFTER the MAF
Scanner data for all 4 dyno pulls
NOS dyno pull
Team ZR-1 True Custom Performance Tuning Teamzr1.com